Top 5 Best Binding Machines & Comparison

Top 5 Best Binding Machines & Comparison



Model
Price
Amazon Rating
Type of Binding Machine
Method of Punching
Punching Capacity
Binding Capacity
Fellowes Pulsar 300 Plastic Comb Binding Machine
Fellowes Pulsar 300
$100-200
4.4
Comb Binding
Manual
15 sheets
300 sheets with a 1-1/2" comb
GBC CombBind C20 Plastic Comb Binding Machine
GBC CombBind C20
$100-200
4.7
Comb Binding
Manual
20 sheets
330 sheets
Fellowes Pulsar E 300 Plastic Comb Binding Machine
Fellowes Pulsar E 300
$200-300
4.6
Comb Binding
Electric
15 sheets
300 sheets with a 1.5" comb
Akiles RubiCoil 4:1 Pitch Coil Binding Machine
Akiles RubiCoil
$100-200
N/A
Coil Binding
Manual
10 sheets
N/A
GBC ProClick P50 Wire Binding Machine
GBC ProClick P50
$50-100
4.1
Wire Binding
Manual
6 sheets
100 sheets



We have tabulated the necessary purchasing criteria of binding machine in the table above. You can get a quick overview of the recommended binding machines by comparing the price and Amazon rating.

Click the model name to visit our review of that binding machine.

Click the binding machine price to check current Amazon pricing and in-stock conditions.

Question by Lord Soth: What is the maximum shifts a Turing Machine can perform on a limited region of tape? Shift Upperbound for BB.?
What is the maximum shifts a Turing Machine of Busy Beaver Type (starts on a blank tape) can perform on a limited region of tape?

Lets assume an n-state TM with a tape alphabet of m-symbols (you can assume 5-state 2-symbol if you like). The tape is unlimited on both directions but I am interrested on set of machines that halt after exploring a limited region of tape (lets call that k). I don’t care about non-halting machines as busy beaver problem (check wikipedia) states. I want to formulize max(shifts) in terms of n,m and k.

A simple answer would be shifts < n*m*k because n*m represents all the possible configurations an n,m TM can have on a single cell of tape and after that it has to repeat a visited configuration and loop forever; but in practice this optimality can't be achieved, I search for a better upper bound of shift for an n,m TM within k cells of tape. TM must halt without exploring more than k cells.

Please ask for additional details if necessary.

Best answer:

Answer by xiaodao
I believe the busy beaver problem has been proven to be non computable, that will mean you cannot find a formula with any reasonable upper bound.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Busy_beaver

Add your own answer in the comments!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Question by littlemissy282003: A company supervisor asks for volunteers from the first shift to help assemble a new binding machine?
that must be on-line within the next 24 hours. Grady lifts his chin and his shoulders, mods, and says “I can do it.” In the social cognitive perspective of Albert Bandura, Grady has appraised a desired out come through self-evaluated
A. expectancies
B. emotions
C. strategies
D. competencies

Best answer:

Answer by kate
Time for you to read Albert Bandura and do your own homework.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

What is the maximum shifts a Turing Machine of Busy Beaver Type (starts on a blank tape) can perform on a limited region of tape?

Lets assume an n-state TM with a tape alphabet of m-symbols (you can assume 5-state 2-symbol if you like). The tape is unlimited on both directions but I am interrested on set of machines that halt after exploring a limited region of tape (lets call that k). I don’t care about non-halting machines as busy beaver problem (check wikipedia) states. I want to formulize max(shifts) in terms of n,m and k.

A simple answer would be shifts < n*m*k because n*m represents all the possible configurations an n,m TM can have on a single cell of tape and after that it has to repeat a visited configuration and loop forever; but in practice this optimality can’t be achieved, I search for a better upper bound of shift for an n,m TM within k cells of tape. TM must halt without exploring more than k cells.

Please ask for additional details if necessary.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

that must be on-line within the next 24 hours. Grady lifts his chin and his shoulders, mods, and says “I can do it.” In the social cognitive perspective of Albert Bandura, Grady has appraised a desired out come through self-evaluated
A. expectancies
B. emotions
C. strategies
D. competencies

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • MySpace

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Powered by WP Robot

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Powered by WP Robot